Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Clinics ; 69(supl.1): 51-54, 1/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-699025

ABSTRACT

Lung transplantation is a well-established treatment for advanced lung diseases. In children, the diseases that most commonly lead to the need for a transplantation are cystic fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, and bronchiolitis. However, the number of pediatric lung transplantations being performed is low compared with the number of transplants performed in the adult age group. The objective of this study was to demonstrate our experience with pediatric lung transplants over a 10-year period in a program initially designed for adults.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Child , Humans , Graft Rejection/blood , Lung Transplantation , Brazil , Cystic Fibrosis/surgery , Lung Transplantation/mortality , Lung Transplantation , Medical Records , Primary Graft Dysfunction/classification , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
2.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 15(3): 245-248, May-June 2011. tab
Article in English | LILACS, SES-SP | ID: lil-589956

ABSTRACT

Information about resistance profile of darunavir (DRV) is scarce in Brazil. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of DRV resistance mutations in patients failing protease inhibitors (PI) and to identify factors associated with having more DRV resistance mutations. All HIV-infected patients failing PI-based regimens with genotyping performed between 2007 and 2008 in a referral teaching center in São Paulo, Brazil, were included. DRV-specific resistance mutations listed by December 2008 IAS-USA panel update were considered. Two Poisson regression models were constructed to assess factors related to the presence of more DRV resistance mutations. A total of 171 HIV-infected patients with available genotyping were included. The number of patients with lopinavir, saquinavir, and amprenavir used in previous regimen were 130 (76 percent), 83 (49 percent), and 35 (20 percent), respectively. The prevalence of major DRV resistance mutations was 50V: 5 percent; 54M: 1 percent; 76V: 4 percent; 84V: 15 percent. For minor mutations, the rates were 11I: 3 percent; 32I: 7 percent; 33F: 23 percent; 47V: 6 percent; 54L: 6 percent; 74P: 3 percent; 89V: 6 percent. Only 11 (6 percent) of the genotypes had > 3 DRV resistance mutations. In the clinical model, time of HIV infection of > 10 years and use of amprenavir were independently associated with having more DRV resistance mutations. In the genotyping-based model, only total number of PI resistance mutations was associated with our outcome. In conclusion, the prevalence of DRV mutations was low. Time of HIV infection, use of amprenavir and total number of PI resistance mutations were associated with having more DRV mutations.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , HIV-1 , Drug Resistance, Viral/genetics , HIV Infections/virology , HIV Protease Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Mutation/genetics , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , HIV-1 , Brazil , Genotype , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Prevalence , Viral Load
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL